
On 29 September the Reserve Bank’s Monetary Policy Board raised the cash rate target by 0.25 percentage points to 4.60%, the fourth increase this year. The Board said some of the upside risks to inflation flagged in August “are materialising”, and that it will do what is necessary to bring inflation back to target, “including increasing the cash rate target further if needed”.
Through 2025, the working assumption in most household and business planning was that rates had peaked and would come down. That was reasonable at the time. It is no longer what is happening.
The Reserve Bank has now raised the cash rate four times in 2026. The target moved to 3.85% in February, 4.10% in March and 4.35% in May. It was held at 4.35% on 11 August, and rose to 4.60% on 29 September. In August the Board’s statement was direct about why: inflation “is still too high”, and it “is not expected to return to around the midpoint of the target range until late 2027 and there are upside risks to this projection”.
The August Statement on Monetary Policy puts the forward path more precisely than the commentary usually does. The forecasts “assume less than one full cash rate increase by the end of 2026, before a small reduction in the cash rate further out”, with the technical assumption peaking around 4.5% in 2027. At 4.60%, the cash rate is already above that assumed peak.
That was already a different picture from “rates are about to fall”. The September decision moves it further: the cash rate is above the peak assumed in August, the Board has said it will raise again if needed, and any fall is some way off.
The June quarter gave the Reserve Bank something, but not enough.
The ABS reported annual CPI of 3.5% for the twelve months to July 2026. Housing was the largest contributor, rising 5.0%.
In August, the RBA’s assessment was that “headline inflation is now expected to have peaked in the June quarter 2026, and is forecast to return to the 2–3 per cent target range by early 2027”. Underlying inflation is the slower story: trimmed mean inflation is expected to remain above 3% until mid-2027.
By 29 September the Board said recent inflation outcomes “were stronger than expected”, with global energy prices much higher than it had assumed in August. The direction is right and the pace is not, which is why the Board moved again rather than holding.
There is a lag between a cash rate decision and the repayment that lands in someone’s account, and this year that lag is still unwinding.
Wages have not kept pace. The Wage Price Index rose 3.2% over the year to the June quarter 2026, against CPI of 3.5%. Real wages are going backwards, which is a reversal of the pattern through most of 2025.
The property market did not wait for the September meeting.
On Cotality’s home value index, national dwelling values fell a further 0.9% in August 2026, with Sydney down 1.4% and Melbourne 1.1%, leaving values 3.6% below the March peak. Capital city listings were 8% above the five-year average in the four weeks to 30 August.
For buyers, that is a genuinely different market from the one that existed in February. More stock, less competition, and vendors who have had to adjust expectations. For sellers, spring listings are entering a market with more supply and fewer bidders than the seasonal script assumes.
One regulatory change from earlier this year also affects borrowing capacity, separately from the rate moves.
Since February 2026, APRA has applied a hard limit: authorised deposit-taking institutions may write no more than 20% of new mortgage lending at a debt-to-income (DTI) ratio of 6 times or greater. The limit applies separately to owner-occupier and investor portfolios and is measured quarterly. Owner-occupier bridging loans are exempt, as is lending for the purchase or construction of new dwellings.
The serviceability buffer remains at 3 percentage points, confirmed by APRA in May 2026.
The practical effect for a borrower is that capacity is now constrained by two separate things: the buffer, which has always been there, and a portfolio-level cap that can change a lender’s appetite depending on where they sit against their own quarterly limit. A borrower declined at one lender on a DTI basis is not necessarily a borrower who cannot borrow. It may be a timing and lender-selection question, which is the sort of thing a broker can help work through.
Four things are worth reviewing after the 29 September decision.
A rate decision is not really one event. It touches repayments, borrowing capacity, cash flow, investment structure and the timing of any property decision, and those sit across lending and advice rather than in one of them.
At Ryker, we work alongside your broker, so the lending question and the financial planning question are answered as one conversation. Your broker looks after the loan, and we look at how it fits with your cash flow, protection and longer-term plans.

Whatever’s on your mind, we’re here to help. You’ll speak with an authorised financial adviser who’ll listen first and get to know what matters to you.
Book An Initial Conversation