
Retirement planning
A couple’s super, income and Age Pension are best planned as one household. It helps to know what that plan looks like for the partner who is left, and whether your paperwork says what you both want.
If you’re planning retirement with a partner, you’ve probably talked about when each of you stops work, roughly what you’ll spend, and what your super and the Age Pension will cover between you. The harder question is what that plan looks like for one of you, if the other passes away first.
It’s a difficult conversation, and none of it has to be settled in one sitting.
For the Age Pension, Services Australia assesses a couple as a unit, counting both partners’ income and assets. From 20 September 2026, the maximum rate for each member of a couple is $933.00 a fortnight, or $1,866 combined, against $1,237.70 for a single person.
What counts can also depend on each partner’s age and whether their super is still in accumulation or paying an income stream.
Super works the other way. Each account belongs to one person, with its own balance, nomination and tax treatment.
The split between your accounts shapes which balance you draw on first and what passes to whom, in what form, when one of you passes away.
For a total super balance above $3 million, Division 296 tax (law since March 2026) reduces super tax concessions from 1 July 2026, with a further step above $10 million (2026-27 thresholds). Each partner is tested separately.
If one of you stops work years before the other, the years in between need their own plan. You can usually start using super from 60, depending on whether you’re still working, and Age Pension age is 67. Questions that come up:
When a partner passes away, Services Australia reassesses the survivor’s income and assets as a single person, and the survivor must meet the single thresholds to stay eligible. Two things move at once:
Couples who were both getting a pension may also receive a lump sum bereavement payment, usually the couple’s combined rate less the new single rate, calculated over 14 weeks from the day of death. Services Australia confirms what applies.

The Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) puts a comfortable retirement for homeowners aged 65 to 84 at $78,998 a year for a couple and $56,166 for a single person, in the June quarter 2026. On Ryker’s arithmetic, the single budget is about 71% of the couple’s.
Super does not automatically form part of your estate, so your will alone may not determine who receives it. What the survivor receives depends on paperwork that’s easy to set up once and forget:

Marco and Leanne are fictional, and this example is for illustration only. Marco, 64, wants to stop work next year. Leanne, 61, spent about ten years out of paid work raising their children, now adults, so her super is well under half of Marco’s. She plans to work part-time a few more years. They own their home, with about $70,000 left on the loan.
Their Ryker financial adviser laid the two timelines side by side, then asked what the household would look like for one of them alone: on the surviving partner’s income and available super before Age Pension age, and any Age Pension entitlement later.
Together they spend about $85,000 a year. Working through their costs with the adviser, they estimated the survivor would still need about $60,000. The adviser also showed that, on today’s limits, assets comfortably under the couple’s part pension cut-off could still sit above the single cut-off.
They looked at whose account a pension should come from first, and agreed that naming Leanne as reversionary beneficiary on Marco’s pension matched what they both wanted, subject to the fund’s terms. Leanne’s binding nomination had lapsed.
Their adviser assessed contribution options for Leanne, including spouse contributions and contribution splitting, alongside their retirement income needs. Their accountant was asked to confirm the relevant tax treatment, including any super left to their adult children. Their broker was asked to explore the options and costs for the remaining loan before Marco’s salary stops.
They left with agreed priorities, not a finished plan. Leanne renews her nomination now. Marco’s reversionary nomination is made when his pension starts, once the fund confirms its terms. Contribution decisions follow the adviser’s assessment and accountant’s tax input, while the broker explores the loan options. The plan is retested for one of them at a review in 12 months, or sooner if health or work changes.
Which account should we draw on first, and what does that leave in each name?
If most of our assets passed to one of us, would they sit above the single limits?
Do our nominations and any reversionary pension say what we both want?
What should our accountant and broker look at first?
Retirement for two

Whatever’s on your mind, we’re here to help. You’ll speak with an authorised financial adviser who’ll listen first and get to know what matters to you.
Book An Initial Conversation